Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 330584 - org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk needed to be tagged in 3.6.2 stream
Summary: org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk needed to be tagged in 3.6.2 stream
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Framework (show other bugs)
Version: 3.6.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.6.2   Edit
Assignee: equinox.framework-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-11-18 11:40 EST by Kim Moir CLA
Modified: 2010-11-18 15:46 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kim Moir CLA 2010-11-18 11:40:59 EST 
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.repository.tools.jar.comparator - Wed Nov 17 14:08:19 EST 2010
	canonical: org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk,3.6.1.R36x_v20101007-7sF99FsLFSyAVFKfV4c7B9BF
		Difference found for canonical: org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk,3.6.1.R36x_v20101007-7sF99FsLFSyAVFKfV4c7B9BF between file:/builds/transfer/files/updates/3.6.x/M20101103-0800 and file:/builds/M201011171123/org.eclipse.releng.eclipsebuilder/../src/reposource/
			The feature has a different number of entries/
	packed: org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk,3.6.1.R36x_v20101007-7sF99FsLFSyAVFKfV4c7B9BF
		Difference found for packed: org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk,3.6.1.R36x_v20101007-7sF99FsLFSyAVFKfV4c7B9BF between file:/builds/transfer/files/updates/3.6.x/M20101103-0800 and file:/builds/M201011171123/org.eclipse.releng.eclipsebuilder/../src/reposource/
			The feature has a different number of entries/
Comment 1 Thomas Watson CLA 2010-11-18 14:30:21 EST 
I think this is a false positive from bug330006

If the simplest thing is for me to retag the feature I will.  Let me know.
Comment 2 Kim Moir CLA 2010-11-18 15:23:38 EST 
Yes, please just tag the feature so the compare tool will find future problems instead of having it excluded by default. I knew this happened before, but was looking in the wrong bucket for bug 330006 :-)  Thanks Tom.
Comment 3 Thomas Watson CLA 2010-11-18 15:46:05 EST 
tagged.