Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 327300 - [C++0x] Allowing move constructors to throw
Summary: [C++0x] Allowing move constructors to throw
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-parser (show other bugs)
Version: 8.0   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 8.7.0   Edit
Assignee: Sergey Prigogin CLA
QA Contact: Markus Schorn CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 327297 369656
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-10-08 02:53 EDT by Markus Schorn CLA
Modified: 2019-03-09 01:51 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Comment 1 CDT Genie CLA 2013-02-27 11:49:47 EST 
*** cdt git genie on behalf of Sergey Prigogin ***

    Bug 327300. Parsing support for noexcept operators and noexcept
    specifications in function declarators.

[*] http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=e5e3a9abc628ef34b550ce1dc640d5d38c394c9e
Comment 2 CDT Genie CLA 2013-02-27 11:49:49 EST 
*** cdt git genie on behalf of Sergey Prigogin ***

    Bug 327300. Parsing support for noexcept operators and noexcept
    specifications in function declarators. Adjustments for CDT 8.1.x.

[*] http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=ae8af8e02fcdf3bc41cf90483954d95183c8e415
Comment 3 CDT Genie CLA 2013-02-27 11:49:50 EST 
*** cdt git genie on behalf of Sergey Prigogin ***

    Bug 327300. Parsing support for noexcept operators and noexcept
    specifications in function declarators.

[*] http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=d89b672a9733d8fe40258958573673321519ef5e
Comment 4 Nathan Ridge CLA 2014-11-12 02:53:04 EST 
Is there anything remaining to be done here?
Comment 5 Sergey Prigogin CLA 2015-07-13 14:09:28 EDT 
I don't think anything else is required to claim this feature.
Comment 6 Nathan Ridge CLA 2019-03-09 01:51:08 EST 
(In reply to Sergey Prigogin from comment #5)
> I don't think anything else is required to claim this feature.

This turned out not to quite be the case :)

Correct evaluation of noexcept-expressions appearing in a constant expression context requires modelling them as evaluations, storing them in the index, etc.

We've just now discovered this in bug 545021 comment 3.