Comment 1 Wayne Beaton 2010-10-05 11:50:19 EDT

Proposal document uploaded.

Comment 2 Wayne Beaton 2010-10-05 11:50:20 EDT

Created attachment 180251 [details]
mylyn/context/zip

Comment 3 Wayne Beaton 2010-10-05 11:55:23 EDT

Link sent to project lead for approval.

Comment 4 Wayne Beaton 2010-10-12 12:43:43 EDT

Approval received from project lead. Approval received from EMO.

I am assuming a project id of webtools.osgi-enterprise-tools.

The entry in the projects database has been created. Proposal record created in the portal. A forum has been requested (Bug 327581).

Comment 5 Wayne Beaton 2010-11-04 10:10:01 EDT

New version of the proposal document uploaded.

Comment 6 Wayne Beaton 2010-11-23 10:47:19 EST

Proposal updated per request from PL.

Creation review has been requested. Suggested Nov 24-Dec 1 and am waiting for confirmation from the PL.

Have requested trademark search.

Comment 7 Wayne Beaton 2010-11-23 11:33:08 EST

PL ready to move head. Review is scheduled pending the outcome of the trademark search.

Comment 8 Wayne Beaton 2010-11-24 13:12:54 EST

Trademark assignment requires permission from the OSGi Alliance to use "OSGi" in the title. Janet has made a request to the OSGi Alliance.

Comment 9 Wayne Beaton 2010-12-03 10:54:38 EST

Received via email to the EMO mailbox:

--
We choose ?Libra? for short name.

We also contacted the OSGi Board. They are going to reject the usage of ?OSGi Enterprise Tools?. 

<snip>

I?ve read the OSGi Trademark Policy: http://www.osgi.org/Main/TrademarkPolicy

Details for our use case are explained in the Trademark Attribution section. As far as I understand a proper usage example is: "CompanyName BrandName ProductName for OSGi Service Platforms." 

So, the project?s long name could be something like ?Enterprise Tools for OSGi? Service Platform?.

And if we take the short and long name together we get ?Libra: Enterprise Tools for the OSGi? Service Platform?. 
--

A trademark search for "Libra" has been initiated.

Comment 10 Wayne Beaton 2010-12-20 12:32:15 EST

Trademark has been approved. We need to schedule the creation review.

Comment 11 Wayne Beaton 2010-12-21 10:52:22 EST

The proposal document has been updated to reflect the new name, "Libra". Foundation database records have been similarly updated. We'll use the proposal document for the creation review.

Creation review scheduled for Jan 5-12/2011.

Comment 12 Wayne Beaton 2010-12-21 10:52:23 EST

Created attachment 185644 [details]
mylyn/context/zip

Comment 13 Lynn Gayowski 2011-01-12 13:55:28 EST

Successful creation review.  Awaiting NPPR.

Comment 14 Kaloyan Raev 2011-01-13 02:35:40 EST

I've submitted the NPPR. Now I see in the portal the nominations of all of the initial committers with status "Waiting for candidate paperwork, Received NCRF". 

Most of the initial committers are existing Eclipse committers. According to the guidelines nothing is required by them. I guess there is now some manual step for them that should be done by the EMO, isn't it?

Comment 15 Wayne Beaton 2011-01-13 08:05:10 EST

(In reply to comment #14)
> I've submitted the NPPR. Now I see in the portal the nominations of all of the
> initial committers with status "Waiting for candidate paperwork, Received
> NCRF". 
> 
> Most of the initial committers are existing Eclipse committers. According to
> the guidelines nothing is required by them. I guess there is now some manual
> step for them that should be done by the EMO, isn't it?

I guess that we need to update that message (we get this question a lot). If the candidates already have paperwork on file, Sharon will take care of it. Each of the candidates should have received an email to this effect.

HTH

Comment 16 Lynn Gayowski 2011-01-24 14:13:33 EST

Provisioning is complete.  Webmaster completed set up of the project on Jan. 21 and project lead was notified on Jan. 24.  Closing as fixed.