326746 – Further incorrect use of EMF bidirectional references in UML metamodel

Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 326746 - Further incorrect use of EMF bidirectional references in UML metamodel

Summary: Further incorrect use of EMF bidirectional references in UML metamodel

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 323000

Alias:	None

Product:	MDT.UML2
Classification:	Modeling
Component:	Core (show other bugs)
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	UML2 Inbox
QA Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2010-10-01 04:37 EDT by Volker Stolz
Modified:	2011-05-31 10:34 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:	320318

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Volker Stolz

2010-10-01 04:37:06 EDT

Build Identifier: M20100909-0800

As a followup to #320318, there is at least one more instance of this problem present in Helios SR1:
Operations within an Interface trigger a similar validation error as reported before.

The opposite features 'feature' of
'org.eclipse.uml2.uml.internal.impl.InterfaceImpl@3aff8399{..}'
and 'featuringClassifier' of 'org.eclipse.uml2.uml.internal.impl.OperationImpl@7852fda6{..}' do not refer to each other

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a UML class diagram with an interface containing an operation
2. Run model validation

Comment 1 Volker Stolz

2010-10-01 05:56:04 EDT

For future reference, the item in question here is CLASSIFIER__FEATURE.

Kenn, is there any way of classifying which EReferences are problematic in general?

Comment 2 Kenn Hussey

2010-10-01 09:03:19 EDT

I believe the problem only exists for bidirectional features which are derived unions.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 323000 ***

Comment 3 Volker Stolz

2010-10-04 05:33:58 EDT

Kenn, did you intend to mark this bug as resolved already? It describes a problem in Helios SR1, and I didn't notice any commit to the respective code yet.

Comment 4 Kenn Hussey

2010-10-04 09:08:03 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
> Kenn, did you intend to mark this bug as resolved already? It describes a
> problem in Helios SR1, and I didn't notice any commit to the respective code
> yet.

It's a duplicate of bug 323000 which will be resolved in the Indigo timeframe.

Comment 5 Kenn Hussey

2011-05-31 10:33:26 EDT

Closing for Indigo release.

Comment 6 Kenn Hussey

2011-05-31 10:34:09 EDT

Closing for Indigo release.