Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 326726 - useradmin bundle missing manifest-version property
Summary: useradmin bundle missing manifest-version property
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Compendium (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 M4   Edit
Assignee: equinox.compendium-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-30 19:17 EDT by Wim Jongman CLA
Modified: 2010-11-10 11:43 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wim Jongman CLA 2010-09-30 19:17:19 EDT 
Manifest.mf should contain this line:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Comment 1 Wim Jongman CLA 2010-11-09 17:22:53 EST 
ping!
Comment 2 Thomas Watson CLA 2010-11-10 09:52:45 EST 
Done for 3.7.  I am a bit confused why this is causing you issues.  Our build process uses the jar ant task which inserts the Manifest-Version header for us.  Our built jars of the useradmin bundle do have the Manifest-Version header.
Comment 3 Wim Jongman CLA 2010-11-10 10:05:34 EST 
Hi Thomas,

Thanks. I don't know why. Buckminster checks out the bundle from CVS and then fails because of the missing property. It should be in the manifest right? Otherwise I can investigate why this is causing bucky so much problems.
Comment 4 Thomas Watson CLA 2010-11-10 11:20:02 EST 
It should be there only to be consistent with our other manifests, but from my POV we should not be required to have the Manifest-Version header in our source files for the manifest.  This is added automatically by the jar utilities during a build.

Anyway, I added it because there is no harm in doing so, it makes it consistent with our other manifests, and most importantly, it helps you ;-)
Comment 5 Wim Jongman CLA 2010-11-10 11:43:28 EST 
Thanks, that is very much appreciated!