Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 325601 - Backport The default editor for a file is not updated when opened in RSE explorer
Summary: Backport The default editor for a file is not updated when opened in RSE expl...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Target Management
Classification: Tools
Component: RSE (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2.2   Edit
Assignee: David McKnight CLA
QA Contact: Martin Oberhuber CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 325502
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-09-17 10:37 EDT by David McKnight CLA
Modified: 2010-11-12 08:53 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
dmcknigh: review? (kjdoyle)


Attachments
backport patch (2.65 KB, patch)
2010-09-17 10:38 EDT, David McKnight CLA
no flags Details | Diff
Simplified patch v2 (2.54 KB, patch)
2010-10-06 09:54 EDT, Martin Oberhuber CLA
mober.at+eclipse: review?
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David McKnight CLA 2010-09-17 10:37:29 EDT
This bug is for the backport of bug 325502 to the R3_2_maintenance stream.
Comment 1 David McKnight CLA 2010-09-17 10:38:09 EDT
Created attachment 179120 [details]
backport patch
Comment 2 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2010-10-06 09:53:13 EDT
On the R3_2_maintenance stream, this will actually be scheduled to go into 3.2.2
Comment 3 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2010-10-06 09:54:22 EDT
Created attachment 180329 [details]
Simplified patch v2

Dave, can you try whether attached simplified patch works for you?

I'd prefer directly asking for the field to change, rather than iterating over the fields ourselves. Just add your review+ if it's fine for you.
Comment 4 David McKnight CLA 2010-10-06 11:16:51 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=180329) [details]
> Simplified patch v2
> 
> Dave, can you try whether attached simplified patch works for you?
> 
> I'd prefer directly asking for the field to change, rather than iterating over
> the fields ourselves. Just add your review+ if it's fine for you.

Yes, the simpler change should work.
Comment 5 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2010-11-12 08:53:37 EST
Released the simplified patch for 3.2.2 >= M20101112