Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 324948 - [tests] Test failures due to missing repository
Summary: [tests] Test failures due to missing repository
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: p2 (show other bugs)
Version: 3.7   Edit
Hardware: PC Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 M3   Edit
Assignee: P2 Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 324960 324961
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-09-10 07:24 EDT by DJ Houghton CLA
Modified: 2010-09-22 09:02 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description DJ Houghton CLA 2010-09-10 07:24:29 EDT 
The tests in our builds (M, I, and N) have been failing this week with the following error:

!ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository 4 1000 2010-09-09 15:27:43.819
!MESSAGE No repository found at http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/3.6-I-builds.

!ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.p2.core 4 0 2010-09-09 15:27:43.820
!MESSAGE Unable to load repositories.
at org.eclipse.equinox.p2.tests.full.Install36from35.install36From35(Install36from35.java:66)

This is because the 3.6 i-builds update site has been deleted. We should re-write the test to point to a new repository. (probably the Helios final repo)
Comment 1 DJ Houghton CLA 2010-09-10 08:53:01 EDT 
I talked to Kim and the 3.6 i-builds repo has been removed. It sounds like the right thing to do is change the tests to point to the real 3.6 repo.
Comment 2 DJ Houghton CLA 2010-09-10 08:58:22 EDT 
Fixed in HEAD.
Comment 3 Thomas Watson CLA 2010-09-10 09:24:06 EDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fixed in HEAD.

What about future 3.6.2 builds?  Will it continue to fail?
Comment 4 DJ Houghton CLA 2010-09-10 09:25:15 EDT 
(In reply to comment #3)
> What about future 3.6.2 builds?  Will it continue to fail?
>

I released it to the 3.6.x stream as well. See bug 324960.
Comment 5 John Arthorne CLA 2010-09-10 09:48:45 EDT 
Wouldn't it be more useful at this point for the test to upgrade from 3.6 to 3.7? Of course in the 3.6.x stream it should still test 3.5->3.6.
Comment 6 DJ Houghton CLA 2010-09-10 09:52:12 EDT 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Wouldn't it be more useful at this point for the test to upgrade from 3.6 to
> 3.7? Of course in the 3.6.x stream it should still test 3.5->3.6.

Bug 324962 has been opened to address this.