Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 324239 - 'Deployment Assembly' preference page is too large when there are many MANIFEST.MF entries
Summary: 'Deployment Assembly' preference page is too large when there are many MANIFE...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WTP Java EE Tools
Classification: WebTools
Component: jst.j2ee (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Server 2003
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2.2   Edit
Assignee: Jason Sholl CLA
QA Contact: Chuck Bridgham CLA
URL:
Whiteboard: PMC_approved
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-01 15:27 EDT by Jason Sholl CLA
Modified: 2010-09-02 11:17 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
jsholl: pmc_approved? (david_williams)
jsholl: pmc_approved? (raghunathan.srinivasan)
jsholl: pmc_approved? (naci.dai)
deboer: pmc_approved+
jsholl: pmc_approved? (neil.hauge)
kaloyan: pmc_approved+
cbridgha: review+


Attachments
patch (2.51 KB, patch)
2010-09-01 15:32 EDT, Jason Sholl CLA
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jason Sholl CLA 2010-09-01 15:27:39 EDT
The Deployment Assembly page grow vertically to the size of the monitor for a project that has a lot of MANIFEST.MF Class-Path entries.  Attached is a patch to correct this problem (sets the heightHint to 350).
Comment 1 Jason Sholl CLA 2010-09-01 15:32:47 EDT
Created attachment 177999 [details]
patch
Comment 2 Jason Sholl CLA 2010-09-01 15:35:05 EDT
    * Explain why you believe this is a stop-ship defect. Or, if it is a "hotbug" (requested by an adopter) please document it as such. 

This is very bad user experience for enterprise level customers with huge applications

    * Is there a work-around? If so, why do you believe the work-around is insufficient? 

No

    * How has the fix been tested? Is there a test case attached to the bugzilla record? Has a JUnit Test been added? 

UI - this is only a UI change

    * Give a brief technical overview. Who has reviewed this fix? 

Width hint to 350

    * What is the risk associated with this fix? 

None
Comment 3 Chuck Bridgham CLA 2010-09-01 15:35:51 EDT
approve
Comment 4 Jason Sholl CLA 2010-09-02 09:51:10 EDT
code checked into head for wtp 3.2.2 and 3.3