Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 323997 - edc windows agent - add capability to use new dialog() in ILogging
Summary: edc windows agent - add capability to use new dialog() in ILogging
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-debug-edc (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Ken Ryall CLA
QA Contact: Ken Ryall CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 322609
Blocks: 323998
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-08-30 13:02 EDT by Kirk Beitz CLA
Modified: 2012-05-23 03:59 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
add writeln() & dialog() support to LoggingService.cpp + .h (5.82 KB, patch)
2010-08-30 16:36 EDT, Kirk Beitz CLA
cdtdoug: iplog-
kirk.beitz: review?
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kirk Beitz CLA 2010-08-30 13:02:53 EDT
the ILogging service has added dialog() since 2.0 .

This change provides a way for the windows debug agent to make use of the service.

See the attached patch for the difference with the LoggingService.cpp & LoggingService.h as they exist on top of the changes to be submitted for ecl.bz 322609 .

Once ecl.bz 322609 has been committed and is available on the mirror service for download and patch creation, i will create a new patch and attach it to this ticket.
Comment 1 Kirk Beitz CLA 2010-08-30 16:36:02 EDT
Created attachment 177783 [details]
add writeln() & dialog() support to LoggingService.cpp + .h

patch is ready for review, has been tested with local change to edc windows debugger (not to be committed) to open warning with details at startup.
Comment 2 Ken Ryall CLA 2010-09-01 01:00:14 EDT
Committed to HEAD
Comment 4 Glyn Normington CLA 2010-09-03 03:52:23 EDT
I'm intrigued why 323609 was blocking this bug, especially as this bug was resolved before 323609. Please could you briefly summarise your use of Virgo? Thanks!
Comment 5 Kirk Beitz CLA 2010-09-03 04:46:42 EDT
typo - depends on should have been 322609, not 323609