Community
Participate
Working Groups
Maven 3 Beta 2 is now available, and it would be nice to have this available on the new Hudson instance. Release Notes: http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0-beta-2/release-notes.html Download: http://maven.apache.org/download.html
Dave, as part of our quest for maximum availability/stability, we don't run beta software in a production environment. Please see http://wiki.eclipse.org/IT_SLA#SLA_strategies Renaming the bug to install Maven 3 once it's released.
(In reply to comment #1) > Dave, as part of our quest for maximum availability/stability, we don't run > beta software in a production environment. > > Please see http://wiki.eclipse.org/IT_SLA#SLA_strategies > > Renaming the bug to install Maven 3 once it's released. Actually, we are now, we are running Maven 3 Beta 1 on Hudson, and it's been stable.
Who is 'we' ?
(In reply to comment #3) > Who is 'we' ? Anybody doing eclipse builds with the Maven 3/Tycho builds. Includes most of the WTP Incubator, EGit, and others. I'm fine with holding off on the upgrade. Maven 3 should be officially released within the next month.
Alright, Maven 3 is now out. Can we get it as a configuration option for the builds. I would recommend over a period of time removing the alpha and beta installations and making sure it's communicated to the cross-project-dev list as well. http://www.sonatype.com/people/2010/10/maven-3-0-has-landed/
Any ETA on this?
*** Bug 328529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I've installed Maven 3.0 in the shared directory and added it as an option to Hudson. Does this mean we can 'remove' all of the Maven 3 beta/alpha builds from Hudson? -M.
imo yes, but perhaps dave should say definitively
(In reply to comment #9) > imo yes, but perhaps dave should say definitively I would say yes, after announcing it to cross-project-dev list. Everybody should move the the offical release version.
I think we're good here. Actually, we have an open bug for Maven 3.2/3.3.