Community
Participate
Working Groups
Example: (cloneable?="cloneable" & elements+=STRING*) This rule should be able to consume: "Foo" cloneable "Bar"
That was not the intention of unordered groups. Can't you use elements+=STRING* clonable?=clonable elements+=STRING* instead?
Yes. This would be a possible solution. I only wanted to mention that it would be nice if this funtionality would be there out of the box. When this is not the intention of Unordered groups we can close the bug.
see comments
Closing bug which were set to RESOLVED before Eclipse Neon.0.