Community
Participate
Working Groups
During the 3.6 dvpt, the performance verification process missed to report a regression because she occurred after that an improvement was made on the test. Hence the global results regarding the baseline was flat although it got a severe regression at some point during the dvpt... The performance tool needs to verify that if an improvement is done at some point, then no regression occurs after this point.
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Perf tests need to publish results first in order to see current state and improve after that. 12 years old bugs are not helpful