Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 322413 - need ibm 142 JDK installed on build.eclipse.org
Summary: need ibm 142 JDK installed on build.eclipse.org
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Cross-Project (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Cross-Project issues CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 322416
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-08-11 13:55 EDT by Paul Webster CLA
Modified: 2011-03-10 14:50 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Webster CLA 2010-08-11 13:55:56 EDT 
/opt/public/common/ibm-java2-142 no longer points to a JDK (just a JRE) and that has broking the e4/eclipse 4.1 builds.

PW
Comment 1 Nitin Dahyabhai CLA 2010-08-11 14:00:24 EDT 
Just logging the history: it was an empty folder when I came across it, which I then removed and recreated as a symlink to an already-installed JRE.
Comment 2 Denis Roy CLA 2010-08-11 14:02:34 EDT 
:/opt/public/common/j2sdk1.4.2_19 seems to be a full SDK.  Can you use that?
Comment 3 Paul Webster CLA 2010-08-11 14:25:12 EDT 
does it make sense to symlink from ibm-java2-142 to j2sdk1.4.2_19?

AFAIK the Sun/Oracle JDK will work for us.  But my scripts expect a JDK at ibm-java2-142 (AFAIK for PDE build it's mostly for the jars).

PW
Comment 4 Paul Webster CLA 2010-08-12 14:08:43 EDT 
I've reduced the severity (I have a workaround).  But I can see that having this directory missing can cause existing builds (including any respins of older builds) to fail.

PW
Comment 5 Denis Roy CLA 2011-03-10 14:50:39 EST 
I've added the symlink.