Community
Participate
Working Groups
Here is an entry for a planned new MoDisco technology layer component. MoDisco should propose a metamodel and associated discoverer for a composition of Java metamodel and KDM inventory metamodel (disk file representation). Such a composition will enable a future feature for browsing source code from MoDiscoBrowser. Such a contribution should rely on framework released in bug 322135. Fabien.
Created attachment 176315 [details] Patch KDM Source Utils This patch contains KDM Utils to retrieve informations from KDM Source models. This contribution is a prerequisite for Java Model and Kdm Inventory Model discovery Concerned project is : org.eclipse.gmt.modisco.omg.kdm Regards Nicolas Guyomar
Created attachment 176535 [details] Java Composition Metamodel Hi This archive contains the metamodel for Java and KDM Source composition It referenced both Java and KDM Source metamodel, as well as the metamodel contributed in bug 322135 Regards Nicolas
Created attachment 176537 [details] Java and KDM Source Discoverer for Composition Hi, This archive contains the discoverer to weave a MoDisco Java model with a KDM source one. Regards Nicolas
Created attachment 176539 [details] Test Project for composition discoverer Hi, This archive contains the test project for the MoDisco Java and KDM Source composition discoverer It tests both the memory usage and the integrity of the result model Regards Nicolas
Created attachment 176540 [details] Modisco Customization for Java Composition Metamodel Hi, This project contains the UICustomization project to provide a icon for MoDisco Compositin model representation Regards Nicolas
Hi, Concerning the 4 contributions above : 1. I, Nicolas Guyomar, and others contributors listed in this bug, authored 100% of the content 2. I have the rights to donate the content to Eclipse under the EPL 3. I have already provided the filled Employer Consent Forms to the Foundation Regards Nicolas
Paul, here is a contribution from an employee of Mia-Software, targeting future Indigo release. The company has signed a Member Commiter Agreement. It is possible to commit this work without the need of a CQ (as Sharon confirmed it in older CQ https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3846#c9), with the confirmation that this work is done under PMC supervision. Is it possible for you or someone else of modeling PMC to approve this work ? Such a contribution deals with Java technologies reverse engineering. This theme was planned in MoDisco roadmap ("Theme and priorities" of MoDisco project plan : http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=modeling.mdt.modisco) Thanks in advance.
Miles, here is a contribution from an employee of Mia-Software, targeting future Indigo release. The company has signed a Member Commiter Agreement. It is possible to commit this work without the need of a CQ (as Sharon confirmed it in older CQ https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3846#c9), with the confirmation that this work is done under PMC supervision. Is it possible for you or someone else of modeling PMC to approve this work ? Such a contribution deals with Java technologies reverse engineering. This theme was planned in MoDisco roadmap ("Theme and priorities" of MoDisco project plan : http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=modeling.mdt.modisco) Thanks in advance.
Yes, certainly. I'm not sure exactly what the rules are for "PMC supervision". Ed, cc'ing you in just to check if you have any additional guidance. Just that someone should be aware of it, I presume? My hope is that they don't need to ask permission every time there is a contribution that fits this same pattern?
+1 on contribution. I remember now that this was a fairly large contribution and that in this case PMC should prob. be included. Happy to have you flag me on this in future. Also, this is silly but please confirm no crypto.
I know the PMC approves CQs but I wasn't aware we needed to approve any other "regular"contributions.
Miles, Ed, I have asked before to IP Team what the requirement was to justify that a work is done “under the supervision of the PMC”. Sharon answered that a PMC_Approved on bugzilla is a sufficient condition (i forward you the mail)... But may be it is not a necessary condition. I will ask some precisions. Thanks for your approval. I confirm that the contribution from Nicolas Guyomar does not contain cryptography.
Thank you Nicolas for your contribution. It has been commited into SVN.
Ed, et. al. I think this is just Figure 2 of the poster. http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf Which is the catch all: “Under Supervision of the PMC” – refers to general supervision; sufficient to ensure the code being submitted is in line with the goals of the project from a technical standpoint. This level of supervision may vary by project. Determination is to be made by the relevant PMC of the project." So I think it is more than reasonable to have Fabien make this judgement :) in future while referring back to PMC if there is doubt.
Contribution integrated.
