Community
Participate
Working Groups
org.eclipse.ecf/examples/bundles/org.eclipse.ecf.examples.remoteservices.quotes.consumer depends on a bundle hosted at Github [0]. So far we have avoided dependencies towards non CQed code. Additionally quotes.consumers contains a com.remainsoftware.osgilloscope_0.1.0.jar. Has this code been CQed? A solution might be to move org.eclipse.ecf.examples.remoteservices.quotes.* to Github. Markus [0] http://github.com/ECF/Newsreader/tree/master/bundles/org.eclipse.ecf.services.quotes/
Btw. /org.eclipse.ecf.examples.remoteservices.quotes.consumer/projectSet.psf still points to the non-existing ecf1.osuosl.org CVS repo.
(In reply to comment #0) > org.eclipse.ecf/examples/bundles/org.eclipse.ecf.examples.remoteservices.quotes.consumer > depends on a bundle hosted at Github [0]. So far we have avoided dependencies > towards non CQed code. > Additionally quotes.consumers contains a > com.remainsoftware.osgilloscope_0.1.0.jar. Has this code been CQed? A solution > might be to move org.eclipse.ecf.examples.remoteservices.quotes.* to Github. > > Markus > > [0] > http://github.com/ECF/Newsreader/tree/master/bundles/org.eclipse.ecf.services.quotes/ Adding Wim Jongman to this bug...as I believe o.e.e.examples.remoteservices.quotes and consumer are contributions from Wim/Remain Software, and they will have to decide on appropriate strategy for dealing with this issue. My suggestion: move this example code to github if dependencies on non-CQ'd code cannot be easily removed.
(In reply to comment #2) > My suggestion: move this example code to github if > dependencies on non-CQ'd code cannot be easily removed. Just wanted to add that if you do so, file a bug with the webmasters to remove the two projects from CVS too so that they are completely removed from history.
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > My suggestion: move this example code to github if > > dependencies on non-CQ'd code cannot be easily removed. > > Just wanted to add that if you do so, file a bug with the webmasters to remove > the two projects from CVS too so that they are completely removed from history. I can move the quote service code to Eclipse or move the Example to Github, it is all my code. I think having sufficient examples is important. However, there are already remote services examples so this might be considered redundant. The nice thing about this example is that it uses some kind of "real" service. I am in favor of moving all to Eclipse because of visibility. PS We could create a new repository "services" that holds some usable "remote" services like the quotes service. We could then also add other trivial and non-trivial services in the future.
(In reply to comment #4) > I can move the quote service code to Eclipse or move the Example to Github, it > is all my code. I think having sufficient examples is important. However, there > are already remote services examples so this might be considered redundant. > > The nice thing about this example is that it uses some kind of "real" service. > > I am in favor of moving all to Eclipse because of visibility. If the code ownership is your, I'm +1 for moving the code to eclipse.org too. > PS > We could create a new repository "services" that holds some usable "remote" > services like the quotes service. We could then also add other trivial and > non-trivial services in the future. I suggest we postpone this until we start restructuring the repo as part of the git move. Moving folders in CVS just sucks.
The quote services will be the first services and they are not yet checked in so this should be possible now.
Moved code from git.eclipse.org to Newsreader project on Github
