Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 320236 - [Compatibility] The progress bar stays in the status bar forever
Summary: [Compatibility] The progress bar stays in the status bar forever
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: e4
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 4.1 M1   Edit
Assignee: Remy Suen CLA
QA Contact: Remy Suen CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-07-19 05:51 EDT by Szymon Brandys CLA
Modified: 2010-07-28 16:21 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Illustration (93.23 KB, image/png)
2010-07-19 05:53 EDT, Szymon Brandys CLA 		no flags Details
WorkbenchWindow patch v1 (792 bytes, patch)
2010-07-19 19:33 EDT, Remy Suen CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Szymon Brandys CLA 2010-07-19 05:51:01 EDT 
Version: 4.0.0
Build id: I20100716-1834

Steps:
1) Check out org.eclipse.core.contentype
2) Open org.eclipse.core.internal.content.ContentType in Java Editor
3) Open History View
4) In the editor open its context menu and choose Team > Show Annotation
5) When the operation is finished, see that the progress bar does not disappear
Comment 1 Szymon Brandys CLA 2010-07-19 05:53:29 EDT 
Created attachment 174600 [details]
Illustration
Comment 2 Remy Suen CLA 2010-07-19 07:38:00 EDT 
This bug has been there since pretty much day one but has always been a low priority for me. Will try to spend some cycles to investigate this this week.
Comment 3 Remy Suen CLA 2010-07-19 19:33:55 EDT 
Created attachment 174690 [details]
WorkbenchWindow patch v1

We need to call done() explicitly in case people don't do it themselves.
Comment 4 Remy Suen CLA 2010-07-28 16:12:48 EDT 
Fix released to CVS HEAD.
Comment 5 Lars Vogel CLA 2010-07-28 16:21:02 EDT 
@Remy: Cool, looks like you were hungry to continue coding without limitations. :-)