Community
Participate
Working Groups
3.6 RC4+ (I20100608-0911). I started to work on 3.7 and increased the bundle version of 'org.eclipse.jdt.ui' to '3.7.0'. This resulted in 8 API tooling errors (see below) which I cannot get rid of (tried clean all + full build; exit, restart, clean all + full build). Description Resource Path Location Type Invalid @since 3.6 tag on OPEN_ATTACHED_JAVA_DOC; expecting @since 3.7 JdtActionConstants.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 88 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on OPEN_ATTACHED_JAVADOC; expecting @since 3.7 IJavaEditorActionDefinitionIds.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 508 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION; expecting @since 3.7 IJavaEditorActionDefinitionIds.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 488 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION; expecting @since 3.7 JdtActionConstants.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 55 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.OpenAttachedJavadocAction; expecting @since 3.7 OpenAttachedJavadocAction.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 55 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.OpenImplementationAction; expecting @since 3.7 OpenImplementationAction.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions line 52 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on PREF_ANONYMOUS_EXPAND_WITH_CONSTRUCTORS; expecting @since 3.7 PreferenceConstants.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui line 3286 @since tag problem Invalid @since 3.6 tag on PREF_DEFAULT_EXPAND_WITH_CONSTRUCTORS_MEMBERS; expecting @since 3.7 PreferenceConstants.java /org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui line 3275 @since tag problem
User error! I forgot to update the baseline. However, the tooling should be smarter and detect that case. Maybe it could compare the bundle version in the workspace with the one in the baseline: if the minor segment difference is > 1 then it could warn about potentially outdated base line.
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Please remove the stalebug flag, if this issue is still relevant and can be reproduced on the latest release.
