Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 316258 - Wrong meta-data in org.eclipse.gmt.modisco.kdm.browser.extension
Summary: Wrong meta-data in org.eclipse.gmt.modisco.kdm.browser.extension
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: MoDisco
Classification: Modeling
Component: Main (show other bugs)
Version: 0.8.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P1 major (vote)
Target Milestone: 0.8.0   Edit
Assignee: Fabien Giquel CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-09 04:29 EDT by Gregoire Dupe CLA
Modified: 2010-10-04 13:37 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
fabien.giquel: helios+
fabien.giquel: indigo+
sven.efftinge: pmc_approved+
frederic.jouault: pmc_approved+
Kenn.Hussey: pmc_approved+
fabien.giquel: pmc_approved? (Ed.Merks)
gdupe: review+
nicolas.bros: review+

Attachments
kdm browser extension project patch (2.15 KB, patch)
2010-06-09 05:10 EDT, Fabien Giquel CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gregoire Dupe CLA 2010-06-09 04:29:29 EDT 
Hi,

In org.eclipse.gmt.modisco.kdm.browser.extension:
 - the provider name and plug-in name are wrong.
 - the version number should be 0.8.0 instead of 0.1.0.

Regards,
Grégoire Dupé
Comment 1 Fabien Giquel CLA 2010-06-09 04:41:52 EDT 
Hi,

in addition, in build.properties, the about.html appears in bin.includes but not in src.includes.

Fabien.
Comment 2 Fabien Giquel CLA 2010-06-09 05:10:12 EDT 
Created attachment 171504 [details]
kdm browser extension project patch
Comment 3 Gregoire Dupe CLA 2010-06-09 05:25:57 EDT 
Hi,

Can we apply this patch for RC4+3 ?

Regards,
Grégoire Dupé
Comment 4 Fabien Giquel CLA 2010-06-09 05:34:17 EDT 
Sven,

We are aware it is not a blocking/critical issue, but it is a very annoying displaying issue and the risk for applying such a fix is very low.
That is why we require your approval if you agree with appropriateness and risk for RC4.

Thanks in advance.
Fabien.
Comment 5 Nicolas Bros CLA 2010-06-09 09:39:13 EDT 
I applied the patch to branch 0_8_0 for RC4.
Comment 6 Hugo Bruneliere CLA 2010-10-04 13:37:16 EDT 
The patch has been successfully applied.