Community
Participate
Working Groups
code from HEAD I found that when referencing a line number in JSON we use either "line" or "linenumber" we should use one only - I vote "line" Examples: the break event - "lineNumber" usage: 143 \r\n { "type":"event", "seq":17, "event":"break", "body":{ "contextId":0, "debuggerStatement":false, "threadId":1, "step":"in", "lineNumber":2, "scriptId":1} } the setbreakpoint request - "line" usage: 107 \r\n { "command":"setbreakpoint", "seq":51, "type":"request", "arguments":{ "condition":null, "line":10, "scriptId":1 } }
Created attachment 175537 [details] fix Removes the use of the attribute 'lineNumber' in favour of 'line'
applied patch to HEAD