Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 314275 - Exception in thread "ErrorReader" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Summary: Exception in thread "ErrorReader" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-core (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 7.0   Edit
Assignee: Elena Laskavaia CLA
QA Contact: Doug Schaefer CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-25 10:00 EDT by Jens Seidel CLA
Modified: 2010-05-28 11:34 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
patch (975 bytes, patch)
2010-05-25 10:32 EDT, Elena Laskavaia CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
correct patch (872 bytes, patch)
2010-05-25 20:16 EDT, Elena Laskavaia CLA 		cdtdoug: iplog-
Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jens Seidel CLA 2010-05-25 10:00:52 EDT 
Build Identifier: I20100513-1500

During compilation of a managed C++ project I got on the console:

Exception in thread "ErrorReader" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
        at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.cdt.utils.spawner.SpawnerInputStream.read(SpawnerInputStream.java:71)
        at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:282)
        at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:324)
        at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:176)
        at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:184)
        at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:153)
        at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:316)
        at java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:379)
        at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.ProcessClosure$ReaderThread.run(ProcessClosure.java:53)


Reproducible: Didn't try
Comment 1 Elena Laskavaia CLA 2010-05-25 10:32:14 EDT 
Created attachment 169839 [details]
patch

Either I am crazy or this method never worked properly for offset > 0.
Can somebody review the patch?
Comment 2 Elena Laskavaia CLA 2010-05-25 20:16:10 EDT 
Created attachment 169919 [details]
correct patch

Misunderstood what "offset" means in this function. Corrected.
Comment 3 Elena Laskavaia CLA 2010-05-25 20:24:14 EDT 
It was set as found in 6.0 but I checked 6.0 branch and it does not have this problem, so I set it to 7.0

Fixed
Comment 4 Anton Leherbauer CLA 2010-05-27 06:42:43 EDT 
Mea culpa.  What a silly bug.
Thanks for fixing, Elena!