Community
Participate
Working Groups
Whe two e-fixes patch the same features, they may clash and the result may be that both versions end up disabled. Example: fix1 includes platform 2.0.3 fix2 includes platform 2.0.3.1 If these fixes are both included in superfix1, both platforms may end up disabled, and the workbench will not start any more.
The question is: should we allow "superfixes"? An e-fix is a group of features to be updates, and I think there should not be efixes containing other efixes, but just referencing their features.
Bundling is a common practice. For example, a number of individual e-fixes that address security issues can be grouped together into one easy-to- install 'Security' e-fix bundle. Besides, e-fixes are pretty much regular features and as such are allowed to be included by other features (themselves e-fixes).
Reassigning - see if this make sense today.
In M8, patches to the same features do not disable anything. A feature can have more than one patch. So, one can create as many patches, and they can be downloaded and installed at the same time. Note that patch id's must be different.