Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build Identifier: In the Servers view, under the Timeout section, hit F1 on the Start and Stop controls does not display the help. Please investigate the code. OBSERVATIONS: The ContextIds.java file contains these two entries: public static final String EDITOR_TIMEOUT_START = ServerUIPlugin.PLUGIN_ID + "spge0026"; public static final String EDITOR_TIMEOUT_STOP = ServerUIPlugin.PLUGIN_ID + "spge0027"; Documentation is available: <context id="spge0026"> <description>This is the length of time the workbench is going to wait for the server to start. <b>Tip</b>: If you have a fast processing machine, you can try specifying a shorter timeout interval. If you have a slow processing machine, you can try specifying a longer timeout interval. </description> </context> <context id="spge0027"> <description>This is the length of time the workbench is going to wait for the stop signal from the server. <b>Tip</b>: If you have a fast processing machine, you can try specifying a shorter timeout interval. If you have a slow processing machine, you can try specifying a longer timeout interval. </description> </context> Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 169111 [details] v1.0 Upon investigation it looks like there is a . missing at beginning of the context ids. Eventhough this is a simple change, it is comming late in the cycle. I would like to postpone this fix until the next maintenance release
* Explain why you believe this is a stop-ship defect. Or, if it is a "hotbug" (requested by an adopter) please document it as such. This is not a stop-ship, but something that we delayed from 3.2 into 3.2.1, because it came a little late in the cycle, we now want to put it in. * Is there a work-around? If so, why do you believe the work-around is insufficient? No workaround. * How has the fix been tested? Is there a test case attached to the bugzilla record? Has a JUnit Test been added? I tested it by launching the workbench and ensuring the help displays. * Give a brief technical overview. Who has reviewed this fix? adding a dot at the begging of the context id * What is the risk associated with this fix? low, only compilation problems or that the contextid are incorrect and display help for a different item
Changes checked into 32M
Changes checked into HEAD
changes released to HEAD
changes released to 32M
New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/108970