Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 313141 - multiple slaves listed instead of just build2 and master
Summary: multiple slaves listed instead of just build2 and master
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: CI-Jenkins (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: CI Admin Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 315643
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-05-17 10:32 EDT by Kim Moir CLA
Modified: 2011-03-10 15:13 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
screen shot (42.92 KB, image/jpeg)
2010-05-17 10:32 EDT, Kim Moir CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kim Moir CLA 2010-05-17 10:32:35 EDT
Created attachment 168737 [details]
screen shot

When looking at hudson, it appears there are many other slaves listed other than build2 and master.  Just wondering why? I'll attach a screen shot.
Comment 1 David Carver CLA 2010-05-17 11:43:34 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created an attachment (id=168737) [details]
> screen shot
> 
> When looking at hudson, it appears there are many other slaves listed other
> than build2 and master.  Just wondering why? I'll attach a screen shot.

These are the labels that have been created for the various build nodes.  Master has a bunch of labels that somebody created, as well as the Slave node itself.

If Slaves are grouped together with the same labels, then if you want your builds to run on a particular configuration, but did not care which machine it actually ran on, you can Tie your build to one of the available configurations.

We probably need to make the number of labels a bit smaller and more specific to help provide meaning.

You can also tie your build by the Node name of the build machine as well.
Comment 2 Kim Moir CLA 2010-05-17 11:56:13 EDT
Yes, I thought they must have been labels.  I agree, it would make sense to limit the number of labels to reduce confusion.
Comment 3 Denis Roy CLA 2011-03-10 15:13:00 EST
I think we're good here.  If not, then I don't know what to do.