Community
Participate
Working Groups
Created attachment 168274 [details] Language Pack Contribution DE Full Translation of Eclipse 3.5 Language Pack for DE, FR, JA, KO, RU, and ZH_CN. Produced by Adobe Systems Incorporated Contributing Engineers - Jeff Rueppel, Margaret Wong, Morten Nilsen, John Nguyen, Fei Wang. Human translation - passed through Adobe Localization Format ALF during production. All contributions encoded as UTF8
Created attachment 168287 [details] Language Pack Contribution FR
Created attachment 168288 [details] Language Pack Contribution JA
Created attachment 168289 [details] Language Pack Contribution KO
Created attachment 168290 [details] Language Pack Contribution RU
Created attachment 168291 [details] Language Pack Contribution ZH_CN
Thanks, guys! I've opened up CQ 4115
> Thanks, guys! I've opened up CQ 4115 The Eclipse IP team has responded this: According to the information from the referenced bug, the translated files are representative of Eclipse version 3.5. However, some of the property files translated appear to be historical and do not represent version 3.5. In fact, the files in question were amended in the repository some time ago (years in some cases) to adjust copyright and license information. We are more than happy to work with the contributor(s) to resolve the issues. As such, can you please arrange for the following files to be replaced (with appropriate versions) and re-translated: swt.internal.gtk.properties swt.internal.gnome.properties swt.internal.accessibility.gtk.properties systembundle.properties Additionally, some feature, about and plugin property files also fall into the same situation. I've randomly spot checked some of them against the repo and there are later versions of these files required as well. ====================== In other words, there are some files (such as those listed above) that are not from version 3.5. They have since had header corrections brought to them. We don't want to distribute language packs based on file versions that differ from what is in CVS for that version.
about Contribution JA, I have already checked and input into babel from last autumn, thanks to contribution datas.
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie.
This bug is too old. Thanks to Adobe for the contribution.
