Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 312667 - [pmi] Make the CQ cryptography field a little more tolerant
Summary: [pmi] Make the CQ cryptography field a little more tolerant
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Project Management & Portal (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Portal Bugzilla Dummy Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-12 12:47 EDT by Glyn Normington CLA
Modified: 2017-03-27 22:00 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Glyn Normington CLA 2010-05-12 12:47:41 EDT 
I recently raised some CQs and put "No." in answer to the cryptography question. These CQs were then flagged as cryptography=yes until someone noticed and then we had them corrected.

Please consider allowing "No." as an alternative to "No" and perhaps allow other capitalisations too such as "no" and "no.".

This will avoid the same problem occurring in the future.
Comment 1 Barb CLA 2010-06-23 16:05:25 EDT 
Hi Wayne,

Are portal code changes yours, or should Webmaster be looking at this one?

Thanks.

Barb
Comment 2 Srikanth Sankaran CLA 2013-03-18 08:17:10 EDT 
I tripped into this too today while raising https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7122.
Comment 3 Nathan Gervais CLA 2013-04-02 11:53:21 EDT 
The new IPzilla module for the PMI no longer attempts to force this as a yes/no decision, the data entered will be repeated exactly as typed into the CQ comments when generated.
Comment 4 Eclipse Genie CLA 2015-03-24 01:33:06 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 5 Eclipse Genie CLA 2017-03-14 20:13:34 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 6 Wayne Beaton CLA 2017-03-27 22:00:29 EDT 
(In reply to Nathan Gervais from comment #3)
> The new IPzilla module for the PMI no longer attempts to force this as a
> yes/no decision, the data entered will be repeated exactly as typed into the
> CQ comments when generated.

It looks like we've been FIXED for a while...