Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 22396 - Productization of debug perspective
Summary: Productization of debug perspective
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 36495
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Debug (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Darin Wright CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-08-13 12:28 EDT by Darin Wright CLA
Modified: 2003-05-14 09:55 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Darin Wright CLA 2002-08-13 12:28:19 EDT
ne of the things that iSeries folks think is relatively annoying for our
customers is the fact
that debug perspective contains a number of views that are totally
irrelevant for the iSeries
developers that use (for example COBOL or RPG).

Of course they can remove the views that are of no use to them, but some of
them will have
hard time figuring this out, others will wonder how come there are views
that are not applicable
to them.
I was wondering if, perhaps, there is a way for a product that ships the
ECLIPSE debug solution
to provide a product-meaningful default set of views for the debug
perspective. Of course customers
will be able to alter this setting as they require new views, but we can
make a good first impression.
Comment 1 Darin Wright CLA 2002-08-13 12:29:54 EDT
marking as 'later' (until 2.1 feature set is determined).
Comment 2 Jared Burns CLA 2002-08-13 13:05:03 EDT
How could we reconcile this with multiple installed products? If two providers 
say they want two different layouts, which do we choose?

If a provider wants a specific layout for debugging their applications, I 
think the only feasible way to get this is to define their own perspective.
Comment 3 Darin Wright CLA 2003-05-14 09:54:08 EDT
Re-open as dup.
Comment 4 Darin Wright CLA 2003-05-14 09:55:22 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36495 ***