This Bugzilla instance is deprecated, and most Eclipse projects now use GitHub or Eclipse GitLab. Please see the deprecation plan for details.
Bug 216332 - Overall vision, direction, and requirements for COSMOS 1.x Security
Summary: Overall vision, direction, and requirements for COSMOS 1.x Security
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Cosmos (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Deadline: 2008-05-02
Assignee: Jimmy Mohsin CLA
QA Contact: Mark Weitzel CLA
URL: http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_Design...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 231400
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-01-23 14:35 EST by Jimmy Mohsin CLA
Modified: 2012-01-03 13:48 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-01-23 14:35:01 EST 
This is the phase 2 design work for Security.  This is a continuation of 209337 in i8.
Comment 1 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-04-23 11:07:44 EDT 
Need to revisit this issue in i11.
Comment 2 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-05-16 09:16:29 EDT 
Added the design page at http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_Design_216332
Comment 3 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-05-16 09:17:29 EDT 
Added time estimates.
Comment 4 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-05-16 16:06:44 EDT 
Updated summary field.
Comment 5 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-05-29 16:34:31 EDT 
Given that we are yet to meet with Toni Nadalin in regards to Higgins, I am deferring this ER to post i11.  However, we must try to close this in i12.
Comment 6 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-06-10 11:17:23 EDT 
Changed target from future to i12.
Comment 7 Jimmy Mohsin CLA 2008-06-10 11:54:00 EDT 
Paul,

Re-assigning to you per our email...  Please note that this is an i12 deliverable.

Thanks,
Jimmy
Comment 8 Paul Stratton CLA 2008-07-18 06:40:16 EDT 
Agreed on COSMOS Architecture call (17 July, 2008) to defer this ER to future. There are currently no additional agreed on requirements for security.