Community
Participate
Working Groups
Only update repository configuration every 24 hours.
Created attachment 81337 [details] Maybe this is too simple synchronize on startup is a flag that can be set or unset. Changing true to false is the soluytion to this bug. Or is more functionality required?
Created attachment 81338 [details] mylyn/context/zip
can't set the [patch] flag as not assigned to me :-(
ScheduledTaskListSynchJob already checks to see that it updates the config only once a day. Problem: On start up the date to check against is still null. This is a global, meaning all repositories are checked against the same date! This seems ok as this is the default, one can always force a manual update of teh configuration! Solution 1: persist a single date that any config was last updated. This can be done in global preferences as the config is cached globally as well! Solution 2: persist the per repository date when that config was last updated. This can be done in persisting repository properties Solution 3: check against the file date of the cached config. This should be retrievable and comparable, but seems to low level Solution 1 seems simplest and is therefor preferred.
Created attachment 81441 [details] Patch where last (global) config update date is stored in preferences Should reallly be a per config date, but that is a lot more work
Created attachment 81442 [details] mylyn/context/zip
Robert, can you assign to me?
bug 207498: "stop automatic configuration retrieval if already done" should be marked a duplicate of this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 207498 ***
Thanks for pointing that out. We will make sure that we review patches and assign bugs accordingly but it can sometimes take a few days before we get to a particular bug. Please be patient If there is no immediate response and holler if no one comments within a week. (In reply to comment #5) > Should reallly be a per config date, but that is a lot more work I agree that this should be stored per repository/configuration data and it would be worth the extra effort. Let's continue this discussion on bug 207498.