Community
Participate
Working Groups
I just had a conversion with one of the GWT-Developers on IRC and he stated that Runnable won't get part of GWT-Core because it implies different things (or at least user could imply that (Threading, ...)). So we need to maintain our extensions to the GWT-JRE-Emulation.
Created attachment 80986 [details] Implementation of Runnable and ThreadLocale
Created attachment 82687 [details] Some classes needed for EMF
Created attachment 82688 [details] JAR which can be used as a dependency
Created attachment 83037 [details] Update to align to newest GWT features
Created attachment 83038 [details] Jar package
Created attachment 83045 [details] Removed unneeded AbstractSequentialList
Created attachment 83046 [details] ... and the jar
Happy New Year! :) org.eclipse.equinox.common.gwt .. is this an official plug-in or just something you made up?
Everything is made up, like it should be - this is work in the Eclipse Incubator project.
(In reply to comment #8) > Happy New Year! :) > > org.eclipse.equinox.common.gwt .. is this an official plug-in or just something > you made up? > The projects are only placeholders for the patches and reimplementations of classes for use in GWT. If you look at the build.xml you'll notice that the resulting .jar is named "org.eclipse.equinox.common". Gunnar you also might be interested in the work I do with James Strachan in http://code.google.com/p/uface where we are exchanging ideas and code on how to provide a small facade around Java-UI-Toolkits. If you are interested you are more than welcome to join us ;-) I think it's going in the direction we talked about on ESE last year?
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're closing this bug. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it and reopen this bug. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie.
