Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 200443 - Simplify marking new source files as landmarks
Summary: Simplify marking new source files as landmarks
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 162335
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Mylyn (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Mik Kersten CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-17 22:06 EDT by Robert Konigsberg CLA
Modified: 2007-09-27 16:44 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Robert Konigsberg CLA 2007-08-17 22:06:50 EDT
After-the-fact, I want to add four Java source files as landmarks. I select the files,  right-click and select "select as landmark", and I am presented with four dialogs, in succession, saying "Not a valid landmark, select an element within this resource instead."

1. Why shouldn't I be able to add Java source files as landmarks?
2. Why should the error appear four times?
3. Why should each display of the error not show the resource name, so, if for some reason, only one of the four elements are invalid, I could distinguish between them.
4. Clean up the error message just a little: "Not a valid landmark. Select an element within this resource instead." or "Not a valid landmark - select an element within this resource instead."
Comment 1 Mik Kersten CLA 2007-09-27 15:12:58 EDT
Robert: this behavior has improved some for 2.1, see bug 162335 for details.  Note that your question (1) is still an open question

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 162335 ***
Comment 2 Robert Konigsberg CLA 2007-09-27 15:21:15 EDT
Thanks Mik, I have browsed 162335 and I see what you mean.

Do you wnat me to open a feature request for Item #1? It seems that you may already have one, in which case, nothing further needs to come from me.

Thanks.
Comment 3 Mik Kersten CLA 2007-09-27 16:44:53 EDT
Correct, no need to open an additional one.  You could consider commenting on bug 162335, and mentioning both your points (2) and (4) there so that we make sure that future solutions address those as well.