Community
Participate
Working Groups
On Wednesday, August 15, 2007 at 7am PT there will be a Review Call for a Webtools Project Refactoring Review. This bug is now open for comments and votes. Standard open-source votes apply: +1 (approve), 0 (abstain), or -1 (veto). The voting will be open for at least one week after the review call. Please enter your vote as a comment on this bug, not by using Bugzilla voting. The URL for the review docuware will be added to this bug when it's available.
Review docuware: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/slides/WTP_Refactoring_Proposal.pdf
+1
+1 for document reviewed
+1 Comments regarding boundaries between current projects: -could EJB Tools be encapsulated within Java EE Tools? -there is currently some significant overlap between code covered by Common and logic that is effectively handled by members of the Java EE Tools group (e.g. virtual component model - though this is not actually listed as one of the descriptive parts of Common in the doc); will the scope of Common cover this (and some addition folks will likely need to be added to the Common group)?
(In reply to comment #6) > +1 > > Comments regarding boundaries between current projects: > > -could EJB Tools be encapsulated within Java EE Tools? > Maybe it will end up evolving to that (or is that devolving :0 ... but, on the other hand, thought it best to look for ways to (lean towards) having a "core" JEE project, and then various "tools" could be added on (in future) as separate projects if/when others wanted to contribute them. We know it's not currently perfect, but thought proposal was a step in the right direction. > -there is currently some significant overlap between code covered by Common and > logic that is effectively handled by members of the Java EE Tools group (e.g. > virtual component model - though this is not actually listed as one of the > descriptive parts of Common in the doc); will the scope of Common cover this > (and some addition folks will likely need to be added to the Common group)? > The "commons project" in this proposal is merely reflecting what we currently have in the "common component team". There is work going on to "clean up" the Commons Project so perhaps this sort of issue about "virtual component model" will be addressed as part of that (future) work. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200247 and http://wiki.eclipse.org/Web_Tools_Project/Common/Inventory
Just to document here publicly one error in the "committers lists" in the subject proposal, Konstantin Komissarchik should have (also) been listed in the Java EE Tools Project. Apologies for the omission.
Voting is now closed for this review. Results: +1 votes: 9 0 votes: none -1 votes: none The review received the required number of votes, and the EMO has declared it to be successful. Thanks for voting.
