Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 194186 - WSDL validator checks against a defective XML Schema
Summary: WSDL validator checks against a defective XML Schema
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 173600
Alias: None
Product: WTP Webservices
Classification: WebTools
Component: wst.wsdl (show other bugs)
Version: 1.5.3   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 2.0   Edit
Assignee: Valentin Baciu CLA
QA Contact: Craig Salter CLA
URL: http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicPro...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-25 06:46 EDT by Alexander Veit CLA
Modified: 2007-10-02 10:28 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Veit CLA 2007-06-25 06:46:08 EDT 
Build ID: Build id: M20070212-1330

Steps To Reproduce:
1. Create a WSDL that contains an empty parts attribute aon a soapbind:body element

The following error is shown:

"cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'NMTOKENS'."

However, WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 states that the schema given by the WSDL 1.1 spec is wrong (http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Type_and_Name_of_SOAP_Binding_Elements).


More information:
Comment 1 Richard Mah CLA 2007-06-26 13:15:09 EDT 
Over to you Valentin for further investigation.  Thanks.
Comment 2 Valentin Baciu CLA 2007-09-15 23:27:11 EDT 
Hi Alexander, I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here? You mention the parts attribute of the soap:body element while the section you're pointing out in the WS-I specification mentions soap:header and soap:headerfault.

In any case, as of WTP 2.0, we are shipping the WSDL schema as corrected by WS-I. See bug 173600. Please re-try your scenario with WTP 2.0.

I will mark as a duplicate of bug 173600. Feel free to reopen with more information if you disagree.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 173600 ***
Comment 3 Valentin Baciu CLA 2007-10-02 10:28:16 EDT 
Closing, see comment #2. Please re-open if needed.