Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 186827 - PM - Checklist: Risk List - update per PM review
Summary: PM - Checklist: Risk List - update per PM review
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: EPF (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Ana Pereira CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 163867
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-05-14 12:13 EDT by Ana Pereira CLA
Modified: 2023-02-16 16:24 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ana Pereira CLA 2007-05-14 12:13:17 EDT
This items was reported by Jim Ruehlin as a result of the 11/8 OpenUP/Basic PM alignment review:

Risk List
•	Revise the headers to match the format of other checklists
Headers should be categories that hold questions, rather than questions themselves.
•	Have all potential risks been identified?
This topic is too general. There should be a number of questions here that help the user determine if all risks have been identified. E.g. one bullet item for each risk type (technical, resource, business, ...), and questions such as "Can any team member or stakeholder identify a risk that's not listed?", "Can anything happen that will slow down development?", "Is it possible that competitors will release competing functionality before the team does?" etc.
•	Are risks described without ambiguity?
This is a good question for the checklist, but a full explanation should be in the corresponding Concept.
•	Impact, Priority, and Mitigation Strategy
This could be one item, or they could all be under the same heading, since it's just a check that each risk is complete. It doesn't help identify more risks.
•	This checklist is only accessed from the Artifact: Risk - it should also be referenced from appropriate tasks and guidances
•	Task: Plan Project
•	Task: Plan Iteration
•	Guideline: Risk
Comment 1 Ana Pereira CLA 2007-05-14 12:17:26 EDT
Comment from Brian Lyons on bug 163876, related to this bug:

Is this notion of attaching the checklist to every place the Risk List is
updated appropriate?  If someone was to create a process with a checklist per
artifact, I wonder if it would be overkill to point to the checklist in each
task that talks about the artifact.

Other changes to the checklist are definitely appropriate.

With respect to needing checklists for all the other artifacts, I would like
for us to discuss the notion of a checklist for each artifact as a rule of
thumb.

Comment 2 Ana Pereira CLA 2007-05-17 15:01:08 EDT
Resolved... please review

I didn't change the headers because "At the Nov. 28 Architecture review telecon we agreed that check items should be in the form of a question.  Checklist to be updated accordingly." 

I didn't made any changes on the last topic because I agree with Brian Lyons on comment #1

I also replaced mitigation strategy for risk response strategy (mitigation is just one of the possible responses to a risk), like described in the reviewed concept Risk

Ana
Comment 3 Jim Ruehlin CLA 2007-06-01 17:57:48 EDT
Bug verified - closed.