Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 178520 - wrong view shown / layout problems when restoring FVB that shows Fast View
Summary: wrong view shown / layout problems when restoring FVB that shows Fast View
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 179031
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3 M7   Edit
Assignee: Eric Moffatt CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 178742 179353 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 153957
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-03-21 08:02 EDT by Markus Keller CLA
Modified: 2007-03-27 13:51 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Screenshot (37.81 KB, image/png)
2007-03-21 08:03 EDT, Markus Keller CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Markus Keller CLA 2007-03-21 08:02:28 EDT
I20070321-0010

- new workspace
- minimize lower-right view stack
- open Error Log view (Alt_Shift+Q, L)
- drag Error Log view and drop to Javadoc view ("@" in FVB)
- click Error Log icon to show as fast view
- click "Restore" of FVB

=> Workbench is screwed up:
a) "Problems" tab looks active, but view content area shows Error Log contents
b) Error Log's view toolbar is displaced
c) The view menu shows items from the Problems view
Comment 1 Markus Keller CLA 2007-03-21 08:03:18 EDT
Created attachment 61528 [details]
Screenshot
Comment 2 Eric Moffatt CLA 2007-03-22 09:23:59 EDT
*** Bug 178742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Eric Moffatt CLA 2007-03-27 09:40:03 EDT
*** Bug 178987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Eric Moffatt CLA 2007-03-27 09:41:21 EDT
*** Bug 179353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Eric Moffatt CLA 2007-03-27 13:51:31 EDT
Marking as a dup of the defect I fixed the code against. Note that the 'uncheck Fast View' scenario is covered by bug 178987 which I've re-opened.



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 179031 ***