Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 168099 - [EditorMgmt] Background save implementation should not use scheduling rules
Summary: [EditorMgmt] Background save implementation should not use scheduling rules
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3 M5   Edit
Assignee: Boris Bokowski CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 154122
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-12-14 13:34 EST by Boris Bokowski CLA
Modified: 2007-01-12 15:34 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Boris Bokowski CLA 2006-12-14 13:34:27 EST 
The current implementation uses a scheduling rule.  This prevents the editors' save code from using their own scheduling rule. :-(

Also, there is a chance that an InterruptedException is thrown before the scheduling rule is transferred to the job - this problem probably just goes away once I don't use scheduling rules any more.
Comment 1 Boris Bokowski CLA 2007-01-12 15:34:41 EST 
Fixed as part of fixing bug 154122.