Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 142815 - software update failed to retrieve on Windows 2003 server with detection of 0 local disk space
Summary: software update failed to retrieve on Windows 2003 server with detection of ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Update (deprecated - use Eclipse>Equinox>p2) (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Server 2003
: P3 critical with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2.1   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Update-Inbox CLA
QA Contact: Bingxue Xu CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 138342 142958 145282 145646 149610 151523 152278 152309 156888 157339 158671 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-19 14:12 EDT by Bingxue Xu CLA
Modified: 2006-10-06 17:49 EDT (History)
15 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Intsall in the sw update can not proceed on Windows 2003 (321.05 KB, image/gif)
2006-05-22 14:15 EDT, Bingxue Xu CLA
no flags Details
Fix (872 bytes, patch)
2006-06-04 17:02 EDT, Morten Tokle CLA
no flags Details | Diff
new update.dll from more recent buld (40.00 KB, application/x-msdownload)
2006-09-12 16:28 EDT, Shane Frensley CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bingxue Xu CLA 2006-05-19 14:12:37 EDT
In both 3.2 RC1 & RC2 on Windows 2003 server, the software update failed to proceed to download the discovered update as it shows there is 0 local disk space, while there is plenty of local disk space. This seems Windows 2003 specific issue. Also tested the same update with Eclipse 3.1, and it works fine.
Comment 1 Dejan Glozic CLA 2006-05-19 14:20:16 EDT
Use a more recent release candidate (RC4) - this problem has been fixed.
Comment 2 Bingxue Xu CLA 2006-05-22 14:15:49 EDT
Created attachment 42177 [details]
Intsall in the sw update can not proceed on Windows 2003
Comment 3 Bingxue Xu CLA 2006-05-22 14:17:27 EDT
Tried RC5, it still does not work. The symptom is that: in the Installation dialog page, the free space is 0 KB, and the Finish button is greyed out. If I changed to a new location, then the Finish button is enabled while the Free space is still 0KB. Something must be wrong with the logic of the Install wizard. Please see the attached screen capture.
Comment 4 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-05-24 11:11:44 EDT
*** Bug 138342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Dejan Glozic CLA 2006-05-24 11:15:02 EDT
According to Eclipse 3.2 plan, Windows 2003 Server is not a supported platform (i.e. not a platform we tested on). It would be great if we find what the problem is and fix it but the chances we will do it in the 3.2 time frame are slim.
Comment 6 Morten Tokle CLA 2006-06-04 17:02:42 EDT
Created attachment 43421 [details]
Fix

Function getWindowsVersion did not support windows 2003 server. Applying the patch seems to fix the problem.
Comment 7 El Kodus CLA 2006-06-05 20:09:56 EDT
I have just applied and tried similar fix [...if (osvi.dwMinorVersion>=2)...] for Windows XP x64 and it works fine. Win2003 and WinXP x64 are identified by the same dwMinorVersion == 2.
Comment 8 Bingxue Xu CLA 2006-06-06 16:43:20 EDT
Will this patche be applied in the near future? tnx, bing.
Comment 9 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-06-06 17:14:49 EDT
We will release it into HEAD soon, but it will probably not make into 3.2. Most likely it will go into 3.2.1.
Comment 10 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-06-08 14:38:06 EDT
*** Bug 145646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-06-26 18:25:11 EDT
*** Bug 145282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Panagiotis Korros CLA 2006-07-06 05:46:00 EDT
*** Bug 142958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-07-13 15:03:38 EDT
*** Bug 149610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-07-21 18:00:10 EDT
I am closing this bug please reopen if you still have problems in with new integration build or 3.2.1 builds
Comment 15 Jonathan CLA 2006-07-24 17:37:09 EDT
The latest integration build (eclipse-SDK-I20060718-0800-win32.zip) fixes this issue for me, thank you!
Comment 16 Brian Smith CLA 2006-07-24 17:44:26 EDT
Build N20060721-0010 fixed this for me running Windows x64 on an AMD64 1.5 JDK.
Comment 17 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-07-24 23:30:57 EDT
*** Bug 151523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-07-25 11:49:43 EDT
great news. We want to thank Morten Tokle for providing the fix and Jonathan  and Brian Smith for testing it. 
Comment 19 JustinPitts.34477568 CLA 2006-07-30 15:41:55 EDT
*** Bug 152278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 JustinPitts.34477568 CLA 2006-07-30 16:07:50 EDT
Still experiencing this issue on Vista Beta 2 with eclipse-SDK-I20060725-0800-win32

Comment 21 Brad Clarke CLA 2006-08-02 15:58:20 EDT
This was a really ugly bug to let out the door. An easier way of finding out what's wrong than searching resolved bugs would be a huge step in the right direction, though a quick 3.2.1 with this fix would be ideal. I know it's stopped me from being able to roll out 3.2 (we use this to get checkstyle and we must have that tool available), which prevents us from adpopting everything from Java 5 to JUnit 4 to CDT.
Comment 22 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2006-08-02 18:08:02 EDT
*** Bug 152309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Panagiotis Korros CLA 2006-08-07 10:40:36 EDT
I just tested using eclipse-SDK-M20060802-0800-win32.zip and I have the same problem.

Is this fix included in 3.2.1 builds?
Comment 24 Johans Marvin Taboada Villca CLA 2006-08-29 11:19:36 EDT
I also tested eclipse-SDK-M20060802-0800-win32.zip, and find the bug still present.
Then I tried eclipse-SDK-M20060823-1200-win32.zip (actually eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-M20060823-1200.zip) and the patch [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=43421&action=view] is already applyed there.
So move to M20060823-1200 to fix (unless you have src dist and you can apply the patch manually and recompile the native libs, with -compileLibs flag, check SRC_DIST.zip/instructions.html)
Comment 25 Patrick Caldon CLA 2006-09-03 04:15:33 EDT
I just wanted to add that I found this bug also on windows xp x64 and the move to a recent build (the 30 August merge build) also resolved it.
Comment 26 Shane Frensley CLA 2006-09-12 16:28:21 EDT
Created attachment 49986 [details]
new update.dll from more recent buld

I am using 3.2 GA and I ran accross this because my workstation is windows 2003 server. I fixed it quickly by extracting a more recent update.dll and replacing it here
EclipseInstallPath\eclipse\configuration\org.eclipse.osgi\bundles\109\1\.cp\os\win32\x86
Comment 27 Olivier Dagenais CLA 2006-09-18 22:22:12 EDT
For those of you, like me, who are paranoid about downloading update.dll from this bug report, I can confirm that extracting the update.dll from
<install_root>/plugins/org.eclipse.update.core.win32_3.2.0.v20060809.jar (which I got from the "3.3 Stream Stable Build" - a.k.a. 3.3M1 - release) indeed fixes the problem on my Windows 2003 system and I may now install extensions again.

- Oli
Comment 28 Razvan Corneliu VILT CLA 2006-09-19 19:30:05 EDT
Reopened for Vista. The NT Version for Vista is 6.0 (thus the patch requires minimal refactoring (osvi.dwMinorVersion=0 osvi.dwMajorVersion=6).
Comment 29 Chris Aniszczyk CLA 2006-09-19 19:59:45 EDT
reoponening if this is the case, for 3.2.1 this would be *nice*
Comment 30 DJ Houghton CLA 2006-09-20 16:20:58 EDT
*** Bug 156888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 DJ Houghton CLA 2006-09-20 16:24:13 EDT
There will not be any more build submissions for the 3.2.1 build. Closing as fixed in 3.2.1 so we get accurate bug counts. Opened bug 158064 to address the issue for Vista for 3.2.2.
Comment 32 DJ Houghton CLA 2006-09-20 16:26:30 EDT
*** Bug 157339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 DJ Houghton CLA 2006-09-26 12:01:59 EDT
*** Bug 158671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***