Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 140453 - [Dialogs] JFace error dialog does not resize well
Summary: [Dialogs] JFace error dialog does not resize well
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 72489
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 minor (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Susan McCourt CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-05 18:55 EDT by Jane Tatchell CLA
Modified: 2006-06-06 15:26 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Approximate original dialog dimensions (9.29 KB, image/gif)
2006-05-05 18:55 EDT, Jane Tatchell CLA 		no flags Details
Dialog expanded vertically (13.54 KB, image/gif)
2006-05-05 18:56 EDT, Jane Tatchell CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jane Tatchell CLA 2006-05-05 18:55:25 EDT 
I attempted to synchronize my projects with CVS. I got an immense number of errors. To see more errors, I resized the error dialog, as shown in the attached screenshots.

Expected:
The top portion of the dialog remains at its original height and the text box below increases its height.

Actual:
Both the top, fixed portion of the dialog and the text box expand by the same amount. This produces a large quantity of unhelpful gray, blank dialog.
Comment 1 Jane Tatchell CLA 2006-05-05 18:55:59 EDT 
Created attachment 40538 [details]
Approximate original dialog dimensions
Comment 2 Jane Tatchell CLA 2006-05-05 18:56:34 EDT 
Created attachment 40539 [details]
Dialog expanded vertically
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2006-05-06 06:54:08 EDT 
Errors from brackground jobs use the JopErrorDialog. However, the resize behavior
is in the JFace ErrorDialog. Moving to UI.
Comment 4 Susan McCourt CLA 2006-06-06 15:26:49 EDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 72489 ***