Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 134490 - Integration of astyle or other beautifiers
Summary: Integration of astyle or other beautifiers
Status: CLOSED NOT_ECLIPSE
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: gmt (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Arto Laurila CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-03 07:20 EDT by Oliver Nölle CLA
Modified: 2017-04-11 15:13 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Oliver Nölle CLA 2006-04-03 07:20:35 EDT 
In oaw4 there is so far no support for beautifying generated C or C++ code.

Therefore an integration of astyle or similar is needed.

Possibly interesting: the astyle plugin of jedit:
http://plugins.jedit.org/plugins/?AStylePlugin
Comment 1 Jan Matèrne CLA 2006-09-06 04:02:17 EDT 
I found a "ArtisticStyleBasedBeautifier.class" in ...classic.ant_4.1.0.v20060816.jar - is this bug fixed with that?

PlugIns-Version: 4.1.0.v20060816
Comment 2 Larry Cai CLA 2006-10-17 18:46:35 EDT 
check http://astyleclipse.sf.net
Comment 3 Bernd Kolb CLA 2007-05-23 16:59:31 EDT 
changed component
Comment 4 Karsten Thoms CLA 2007-07-25 16:18:47 EDT 
Due to IP issues we do not have a chance to integrate other beautifiers than the Eclipse platform provides. Because of this we had to remove the Jalopy based Java beautifier and now use the Eclipse JDT implementation. Similar for XML. That's annoying, but Eclipse policy force us to do so. For C++ beautifying we could use CDT in the future.

I've opened Bug#197871 for the implementation of this beautifier.

Any other cannot be handled in the openArchitectureWare core features and must be developed outside, like the Hybridlabs beautifier. The Fornax platform is a suitable place to develop such components.

For the core project I have to reject this request.
Comment 5 Heiko Behrens CLA 2008-12-15 18:52:50 EST 
This bug has been moved to www.openArchitectureWare.org/bugzilla. It has been reopened in a batch process and will be closed again in a few minutes.

Yes, this sounds strange but seems to be the only way to be conform with the bugzilla workflow.
Comment 6 Karsten Thoms CLA 2008-12-15 19:39:28 EST 
This bug has been moved to www.openArchitectureWare.org/bugzilla. This action is part of a batch process. We apologize if you received many mails due to this action.
After change of the resolution the bugs will be closed.
Comment 7 Karsten Thoms CLA 2008-12-16 00:48:42 EST 
This bug has been moved to www.openArchitectureWare.org/bugzilla. This action is part of a batch process. We apologize if you received many mails due to this action.