Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 13426 - Misleading CVS decorators in package view
Summary: Misleading CVS decorators in package view
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 3979
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Team (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Kevin McGuire CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-04-10 15:06 EDT by Scott Rutledge CLA
Modified: 2002-09-06 21:12 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Scott Rutledge CLA 2002-04-10 15:06:50 EDT
When "Compute deep outgoing state for folders" is enabled, the package view can be misleading: it 
will mark a package as outgoing if any class in that package, or any sub-package, is dirty. This is 
alright for the navigator view, which is strictly hierarcical, but the package view is a flat 
hierarchy. Example:

> package (no dirty files)
> package.subpackage (has dirty 
files)

Both packages are shown as outgoing, even though only package.subpackage has 
modified files. It would be preferrable to package nodes marked as outgoing only if files 
directly in that package are dirty, and ignore any subpackages files.
Comment 1 Erich Gamma CLA 2002-04-13 13:44:03 EDT
This is a known problem that is a consequence of the difference between the 
resource and the package structure. This would require support to customize the 
CVS decorator for rendering Java. In particular this would have to be done in a 
way so that the JDT does not become dependent on CVS. As far as I know there is 
no such support - moving to VCM for comment.
Comment 2 Kevin McGuire CLA 2002-04-17 15:31:26 EDT
Truth, there is no support because nobody has as yet come up with a good 
solution for logical->physical mapping.
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2002-09-06 21:12:13 EDT
Reopening
Comment 4 Michael Valenta CLA 2002-09-06 21:12:26 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3979 ***