Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 129802 - Editor area corrupted after reattaching detached view
Summary: Editor area corrupted after reattaching detached view
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 128455
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Paul Webster CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-28 11:12 EST by Dani Megert CLA
Modified: 2006-03-26 11:56 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
picture of corrupt editor area (21.73 KB, image/png)
2006-02-28 11:14 EST, Dani Megert CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dani Megert CLA 2006-02-28 11:12:34 EST
I20060221-1300

1. start fresh workspace
2. create Java project 'P'
3. create class 'C'
4. detach the Problems view via tab menu > Detached
5. maximize the editor
6. attach the Problems view via tab menu > Detached
==> the view now takes up space of the editor area which is corrupted, see attached picture.

Probably same issue is reported by bug 116112, bug 128455, bug 128762 and bug 129772.
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2006-02-28 11:14:25 EST
Created attachment 35477 [details]
picture of corrupt editor area
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2006-02-28 11:15:27 EST
Note: it's not just a painting issue: the re-attached view is live in the editor area.
Comment 3 Eric Moffatt CLA 2006-03-01 14:49:00 EST
YOIKS!! Good one...also happens with maximized Views.

I'll try to arrange to get this to work without having to 'un-maximize' the workbench but if the fix is not readily apparent then I'll at least put the naive fix and leave the defect open (but at a lower priority).
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2006-03-25 01:55:20 EST
This should be fixed for 3.2. Most likely together with (or as dup of) similar 3.2 polish item bug 128455.
Comment 5 Paul Webster CLA 2006-03-26 11:56:32 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 128455 ***