116849 – Code is not synchronized properly with server

Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 116849 - Code is not synchronized properly with server

Summary: Code is not synchronized properly with server

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 97756

Alias:	None

Product:	WTP ServerTools
Classification:	WebTools
Component:	jst.server (show other bugs)
Version:	0.7.1
Hardware:	PC Windows 2000

Importance:	P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	jst.server
QA Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-11-17 06:16 EST by Anders Høyer Svendsen
Modified:	2006-09-25 03:03 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Anders Høyer Svendsen

2005-11-17 06:16:49 EST

In general, when I make alterations to a JSP page the changes are not deployed 
to the server when doing a "run on server"/"debug on server". 

This also goes for Java code although it is only sometimes that the code 
running on the server is not updated.

Usually it can be fixed by doing a project-clean. Cleaning both the dynamic web 
project and the enclosing ear project. This is not that great a work around  
though since on a large project this is very time consuming.

I use OC4J as application server using the generic server definitions. I have 
made my own definitions for OC4J. I do not think that this is what causing the 
problems though.

Kind regards
Anders Svendsen

Comment 1 Gorkem Ercan

2005-11-17 06:57:05 EST

I believe this is due to builder that updates .deployables. This builder and
.deployables is removed for 1.0 


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 97756 ***

Comment 2 David Williams

2006-09-25 03:03:30 EDT

This bug was moved to 'closed' state, since it is so old is is assumed its dup, invalid, or worksforme resolution is no longer in qustion and the bugzilla needs no further attention. Feel free to re-open, or open a new bug, if this semi-automatic processing was done in error in this case.