Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 113428 - Cvs Content Type should have option to not send content type
Summary: Cvs Content Type should have option to not send content type
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 53235
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: platform-cvs-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-21 17:45 EDT by MG CLA
Modified: 2005-10-26 08:43 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description MG CLA 2005-10-21 17:45:13 EDT
Normally a cvs server can be setup to handle content types automatically. 
Currently eclipse always sends a content type.  It would be nice if there was an
option to say "If Eclipse does not know about a content type to not send
anything and let the server figure it out".
Comment 1 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-10-21 19:40:09 EDT
By content type, do you mean keyword substitution mode? CVS gets the mode for 
the file from the server in the first place so I'm not sure what you are 
getting at here. Perhaps if you gave a concrete example to illustrate the 
problem, it would help me understand what you are asking for.
Comment 2 MG CLA 2005-10-25 20:52:34 EDT
If you add a file to your project and the content type is not listed then
eclipse content type will mark the file as binary.  If you then commit the file,
eclipse will send binary content type to the server.  If eclipse sent no content
type then  the cvs server would be free to pick the content type based on its
knowledge of the extension and associated content type.

Does that make more sense?  Basically this allows you to set your content types
at the cvs server and have it figure out if the file is to be treated as binary
or ascii.
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-10-26 08:43:33 EDT
It wasn't clear from your original description that you were talking about new 
files.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 53235 ***