Comment 1 Pascal Rapicault 2005-08-08 08:50:45 EDT

Could you please verify what I missed here?

Comment 2 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-08 12:19:55 EDT

The platformOptions file needs to be updated to include the 
org.eclipse.core.runtime.adapter package and sourcepath.  Will also need to 
update the topics_Reference.xml.  Will update in 3.2 and 3.1 maintenance 
streams.

Comment 3 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-08 13:13:54 EDT

Is a package.html required?  I don't see one in 
eclipseAdapter/src/org/eclipse/core/runtime/adatper.

Comment 4 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-08 13:25:19 EDT

Added entries in platformOptions and topic_Reference.xml.

Comment 5 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-09 09:45:05 EDT

Moving back to Platform Core to add package.html or close.

Comment 6 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-24 10:53:31 EDT

There was a typo in the topics_Reference.xml and javadoc options files where
"adaptor" was mispelled.  Fixed in 3.1 maintenance and HEAD streams.

Comment 7 Karice McIntyre 2005-08-29 17:36:32 EDT

Sonia, Jeff - the comments below seem to indicate this bug is resolved for 
3.1.1.  Is that the case?  It's still marked as New.  Thanks.

Comment 8 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-08-30 10:23:24 EDT

I can confirm that the javadoc for this class is being generated, however
there is no package description for org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.
(Help -> Platform Plug-in Developer Guide -> Reference -> API Reference). 

Comment 9 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-15 12:10:25 EDT

I noticed no package description too.  Do you know where that comes from (i.e. 
does Core have to change something)?  We should resolve this bug soon.

Comment 10 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-09-15 12:49:53 EDT

Yes, see comment #5.

Comment 11 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-15 13:32:23 EDT

Pascal, in the org.eclipse.osgi plugin, the package org.eclipse.runtime.adapter 
needs a package.html file.  Can you provide this?

Comment 12 Pascal Rapicault 2005-09-15 15:02:17 EDT

I would like to, however we need to be able to filter classes out of this
package as only one class is API. Would you know how to do that?

Comment 13 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-15 15:07:55 EDT

Maybe Sonia will know, if this is even possible?

Comment 14 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-09-15 16:06:15 EDT

I've tried a variety of options (-excludes, only including .java file, etc) 
and to no avail.

Comment 15 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-09-21 16:21:40 EDT

I've found the combination of options that works to generate the javadoc for 
the one class, but I cannot suppress the creation of the entry for the package 
at the overview level.  I've released the change to the HEAD and 3.1 
maintenance streams and am testing.

Comment 16 Pascal Rapicault 2005-09-22 09:46:48 EDT

We don't want to get rid of the package entry in the package overview.
What you have in I20050921-2000 is good, however it is not the right class which
is shown. It should be EclipseStarter instead of EclipseAdaptor

Comment 17 Sonia Dimitrov 2005-09-22 09:58:18 EDT

I've updated the options to do the right class in both streams.

Comment 18 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-27 13:25:53 EDT

I just checked the 3.1.1 RC2 (0923) build and the package description for 
org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor is still blank.  I think because there is 
still no package.html in that package in the osgi plugin.

Comment 19 Thomas Watson 2005-09-27 13:39:53 EDT

I will fix this right away.  What approvals do I need to make this change to 
the RC build of 3.1.1?

Comment 20 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-27 14:05:18 EDT

Mike, is it ok if Thomas makes this change for the 3.1.1 RC3 build?

Comment 21 Mike Wilson 2005-09-27 14:52:21 EDT

yes, it's fine. 

Comment 22 Thomas Watson 2005-09-27 15:28:56 EDT

package.html has been added.  AFAIK that is the last thing needed to resolve 
this bug as FIXED.

Comment 23 Karice McIntyre 2005-09-27 15:38:48 EDT

Yes, I think you are right.  Now we just need to verify it in tomorrow's RC3 
build.