| Summary: | [release] modeling.emf.mwe 2.12.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> |
| Component: | Proposals and Reviews | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | christian.dietrich.opensource, proposals-inbox, sharon.corbett, sven.efftinge |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.mwe/releases/2.12.1 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
This is a bug fix release. No review is required. My apologies for the noise. But we need a review one a year so please review I don’t understand The rules say we need a review once a year we also dont know if there will be an upstream change that forces us to change api and thus might require a 2.13.0 I see where I got confused. The release is scheduled March, but I mixed it up with the simultaneous release reviews that were wrapping up today. I've scheduled the review to conclude on Wednesday, February 17, 2021. I will start the EMO's part of the review in earnest when you submit the IP Log. My apologies for even more noise. The builds listed on the "Developer Resources" [1] reference Hudson, which I assume is bogus. Can you point this to your actual CI builds, please. [1] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.mwe/developer The IP Log is approved. > The builds listed on the "Developer Resources" [1] reference Hudson, which I assume is bogus. Can you point this to your actual CI builds, please.
done
I declare this review successful. Please continue with your release. |