| Summary: | [license] Alternative licensing approval for Eclipse zenoh | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Maria Teresa Delgado <mariateresa.delgado> |
| Component: | EMO Approvals | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | frederic.desbiens, heyong4725, kydos, mariateresa.delgado, mike.milinkovich, sharon.corbett, wayne.beaton |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Mac OS X | ||
| URL: | https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-zenoh | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 558047 | ||
|
Description
Maria Teresa Delgado
Dear Maria-Teresa, Below the motivations for dual-licensing. ------------ zenoh provides a stack that unifies data in motion, data in-use and data at rest. The rational for requesting dual licensing EPL and APL is that in the communication business there are several end-user companies that either require or have a strong bias toward API. Supporting the dual-licensing scheme would remove a non-technical adoption barrier in some of these institutions. ------------ Please let me know if this is fine for you and whether I need to add this to the project proposal. Thanks in advance. Take Care, Angelo Dear Maria-Teresa, Below the motivations for dual-licensing. ------------ zenoh provides a stack that unifies data in motion, data in-use and data at rest. The rational for requesting dual licensing EPL and APL is that in the communication business there are several end-user companies that either require or have a strong bias toward API. Supporting the dual-licensing scheme would remove a non-technical adoption barrier in some of these institutions. ------------ Please let me know if this is fine for you and whether I need to add this to the project proposal. Thanks in advance. Take Care, Angelo Approved. Thanks! |