| Summary: | Performance result graphs are not generated | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Paul Pazderski <paul-eclipse> |
| Component: | Releng | Assignee: | Paul Pazderski <paul-eclipse> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | akurtakov, daniel_megert, ericwill, loskutov, sravankumarl |
| Version: | 4.13 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 4.15 M1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: |
https://git.eclipse.org/r/153443 https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/commit/?id=972cc986e62805523b69f7c4f249e6cc32082f5e |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 558043, 558503 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Paul Pazderski
Finally found something that could explain the problem. I partly wrote it already in comment 0 without knowing. The baseline 'prefix' atm is '4.13-201909161045' but in the result generation the baselineCode is 'R-4.13-201909161045'. Those values in streamSpecific.properties and updateTestResultsPages.sh must be equal and it must start with a letter. It seems that the result generation tool produce errors if it start with a number. New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/153443 Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/153443 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/commit/?id=972cc986e62805523b69f7c4f249e6cc32082f5e Results seems to be there but graphics are not generated. https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20191130-0600/performance/performance.php Yes. My last change helped but now there is a strange ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException I have not seen locally. 06:30:49 [exec] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 126000 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.swt.graphics.ImageLoader.save(ImageLoader.java:515) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.FingerPrint.saveImage(FingerPrint.java:215) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.FingerPrint.save(FingerPrint.java:201) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.FingerPrint.print(FingerPrint.java:149) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.GenerateResults.lambda$0(GenerateResults.java:559) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.syncExec(Synchronizer.java:236) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.syncExec(Display.java:5786) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.GenerateResults.printComponent(GenerateResults.java:557) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.GenerateResults.generate(GenerateResults.java:938) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.GenerateResults.run(GenerateResults.java:838) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.Main.start(Main.java:53) 06:30:49 [exec] at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:203) (In reply to Paul Pazderski from comment #5) > Yes. My last change helped but now there is a strange > ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException I have not seen locally. > > 06:30:49 [exec] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 126000 > 06:30:49 [exec] at > org.eclipse.swt.graphics.ImageLoader.save(ImageLoader.java:515) > 06:30:49 [exec] at > org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.FingerPrint.saveImage(FingerPrint.java:215) Which SWT was used, and where are the full logs? We've had recently a fix in ImageLoader, I wonder if this is before or after the fix. The job is https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/view/Performance%20Tests/job/ep-collectResults/ The failing part is not run on every job execution. Look for the runs with longest log. The latest is https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/view/Performance%20Tests/job/ep-collectResults/11812/ (In reply to Andrey Loskutov from comment #6) > (In reply to Paul Pazderski from comment #5) > > Yes. My last change helped but now there is a strange > > ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException I have not seen locally. > > > > 06:30:49 [exec] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 126000 > > 06:30:49 [exec] at > > org.eclipse.swt.graphics.ImageLoader.save(ImageLoader.java:515) > > 06:30:49 [exec] at > > org.eclipse.test.performance.ui.FingerPrint.saveImage(FingerPrint.java:215) > > Which SWT was used, and where are the full logs? We've had recently a fix in > ImageLoader, I wonder if this is before or after the fix. Good question, this sort of thing shouldn't be able to happen with the new fix. Any SWT build after I20191127-0600 should be good. This is probably older. The application is in releng buildtools org.eclipse.test.performance.ui without any version range for SWT and the last time it was updated was afaik 2019-10-15. (see bug 548523 comment 30 ff) (In reply to Paul Pazderski from comment #9) > This is probably older. The application is in releng buildtools > org.eclipse.test.performance.ui without any version range for SWT and the > last time it was updated was afaik 2019-10-15. (see bug 548523 comment 30 ff) Build tools is set of plugins. We install these on top of latest I-build(platform product) for generating these pages. Here is the eclipse instance used https://build.eclipse.org/eclipse/builds/4I/siteDir/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20191202-1800/org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder/ This can be accessible through sftp to build.eclipse.org and at path /shared/eclipse/builds/4I/siteDir/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20191202-1800/org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder/ Thanks for the clarification Sravan. Had the vague feeling I missed something. Since SWT should be fixed the error is more likely in the custom downsampling method which directly manipulate the image data. Will check this later. Found time to reproduce the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. As expected the downsampling method is involved but in my opinion it is an SWT error. Opened bug 558043. Will see if I need to change something in the result tool. PS: since it is not obvious. The used method Utils.downSample does not change the image size but reduce the number of colors to max 256 and try to create an image with color table. Finally, after quite a long time performance tests are back and produce complete results again. Also thanks to Sravan for his support. (In reply to Paul Pazderski from comment #14) > Finally, after quite a long time performance tests are back and produce > complete results again. > Also thanks to Sravan for his support. Thank you Paul! It is much appreciated!! |