Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 539005

Summary: [release] technology.stem 4.0.0
Product: Community Reporter: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton>
Component: Proposals and ReviewsAssignee: Eclipse Management Organization <emo>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: ahmadswaid, cydnie.smith, jhkauf, sedlund, sharon.corbett, wayne.beaton
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.stem/releases/4.0.0
Whiteboard:

Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2018-09-12 22:27:01 EDT
We'll use this bug to track the release

We require IP Team approval of the IP Log.

We require PMC approval of the release and review materials.
Comment 1 Wayne Beaton CLA 2018-11-16 16:10:51 EST
What is the status of this release. Will the project team engage?

There's more information regarding releases and reviews in the handbook.

https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release
Comment 2 Cydnie Smith CLA 2018-11-20 08:55:20 EST
I reached out to James regarding release. He advised there were delays, and as a result I have changed release date to January 15.
Comment 3 Wayne Beaton CLA 2018-12-10 16:49:39 EST
The project is missing LICENSE and NOTICE files in the repository root. Can somebody from the project team please add them? The Documentation template generator should be able to help [1] (note that it looks like it's currently not functioning; Webmaster has been advised).

You should also add a CONTRIBUTING file with information on how to contribute.

It's not apparent to me how I go about building org.eclipse.stem.git. I found a build.sh file, but it doesn't seem to work (it appears to depend on some system variables; do I need to set these before calling the script?) Some documentation would be helpful.

I need the project to update to EPL-2.0. This will require that all file headers be updated. Is this something that's possible to complete in time for this release?

I noticed that some of your generated content does not have file headers. Strictly, speaking we need all content to have copyright headers (unless it is particularly onerous or technically undesirable to do so). Is this something that you can add when you update to EPL-2.0?


[1] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/documentation.php?id=technology.stem
Comment 4 James Kaufman CLA 2018-12-10 23:59:10 EST
Thank you Wayne,
Our project leads and committers are discussing the remaining todos. I may have to slip our release date to be sure we get it all done but will know for sure in a week or so. Thank you very much for the detailed feedback.
Comment 5 James Kaufman CLA 2019-01-02 15:01:06 EST
Updated the release record. Also added a pdf of the release review slides to our wiki and the  release record now points to that url (as does our 'what's new page'.

Re the IP Log, we did summit the IP Log for review and for PMC Approval. The CQ 18602. 

ISSUE:
On the form I was unable to select in the combo box that this review is a release review (it did not have the release listed).


Cydnie, the nearest available data for the IP review is Jan 16 so we may have to slip our release data another week or two....
There are no new issues and no third party contributions since the last IP review.

Ahmad has merged the STEM 4 branch back to head and the Eclipse CI is now building from head.
Comment 6 Cydnie Smith CLA 2019-01-03 12:44:13 EST
I have pushed your release date to Feb 6 to accommodate the IP review, and provide time to engage in the release review. I will amend as needed.
Comment 7 James Kaufman CLA 2019-01-04 18:51:04 EST
Ahmad merged the STEM 4 Branch back to master branch
All Java files have been updated with copyright date and epl-2 license
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/
Comment 8 James Kaufman CLA 2019-01-04 18:52:08 EST
TODO:
Still need to get Developers doc in line with setup of dev environment
fix ant build of earth science data plugins after repository reorg
Comment 9 Wayne Beaton CLA 2019-01-14 23:50:46 EST
The IP Log is approved.
Comment 10 Wayne Beaton CLA 2019-01-14 23:55:14 EST
(In reply to James Kaufman from comment #5)
> ISSUE:
> On the form I was unable to select in the combo box that this review is a
> release review (it did not have the release listed).

My best guess is that the date on the release might have been out of range. Is it possible that it had been set to January 2018 before we changed it?
Comment 11 James Kaufman CLA 2019-01-15 16:37:12 EST
Thank you Wayne. 
It is possible I made an error entering the date that caused it to be out of range. Thank you very much for fixing it.
Comment 12 Cydnie Smith CLA 2019-01-29 08:25:59 EST
PMC approval: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/technology-pmc/msg10714.html
Comment 13 Cydnie Smith CLA 2019-01-29 08:26:17 EST
I have scheduled the review to conclude on Feb 6.
Comment 14 Cydnie Smith CLA 2019-02-07 07:54:04 EST
I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release.
Comment 15 James Kaufman CLA 2019-02-07 12:44:46 EST
Thank you Cydnie :-)