Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [release] modeling.emft.emf-facet 1.3.0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> |
| Component: | Proposals and Reviews | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | frederic.madiot, gdupe, sharon.corbett |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emft.emf-facet/releases/1.3.0 | ||
| See Also: |
https://git.eclipse.org/r/123373 https://git.eclipse.org/c/facet/org.eclipse.emf.facet.releng.git/commit/?id=17beef9754836f8a2630669a347812c0e899e06f https://git.eclipse.org/c/facet/org.eclipse.emf.facet.dev.git/commit/?id=258d9f004e03120f9dbd17a1b6db44f0ae9e120d https://git.eclipse.org/c/facet/org.eclipse.emf.facet.main.git/commit/?id=b2ee7c076562dfaf12da8dcd94252eadd5f7c6b1 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
> We require IP Team approval of the IP Log.
The IP Log is approved.
I've scheduled the review for June 6/2018. The project currently uses the EPL-1.0. Does the project have a plan to update to the EPL-2.0 following this release? I've noticed that at least one of the project repositories is missing NOTICE, LICENSE, and CONTRIBUTING files. Please add them. There's help here: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#legaldoc https://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/documentation.php?id=modeling.emft.emf-facet New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/123373 Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/123373 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/facet/org.eclipse.emf.facet.main.git/commit/?id=b2ee7c076562dfaf12da8dcd94252eadd5f7c6b1 (In reply to Wayne Beaton from comment #3) > I've scheduled the review for June 6/2018. > > The project currently uses the EPL-1.0. Does the project have a plan to > update > to the EPL-2.0 following this release? As far I understand, the Eclipse foundation would like reduce license proliferation and the update to the EPL-2.0 doesn’t require too much efforts: - It is not required get the agreement of all the contributors. - We just have to update the file headers and notices. If my understanding is good, I think that it would be reasonable to plan an update to EPL-2.0 for the next main release (1.4.0). > I've noticed that at least one of the project repositories is missing > NOTICE, LICENSE, and CONTRIBUTING files. Please add them. I’ve added the file NOTICE, LICENSE, and CONTRIBUTING to the three EMF Facet’s Git repositories. I didn’t find a plain text version of the EPL 1.0, I’ve copied https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html. Does it matter? Is this HTML version of EPL 1.0 considered as human readable? > There's help here: > > https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#legaldoc > https://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/documentation.php?id=modeling.emft. > emf-facet The file generator helped a lot: thank you. (In reply to Gregoire Dupe from comment #6) > As far I understand, the Eclipse foundation would like reduce license > proliferation and the update to the EPL-2.0 doesn’t require too much efforts: > - It is not required get the agreement of all the contributors. > - We just have to update the file headers and notices. > > If my understanding is good, I think that it would be reasonable to plan an > update to EPL-2.0 for the next main release (1.4.0). +1 Your understanding is good. > I’ve added the file NOTICE, LICENSE, and CONTRIBUTING to the three EMF > Facet’s Git repositories. +1 > I didn’t find a plain text version of the EPL 1.0, I’ve copied > https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html. Does it matter? Is this > HTML version of EPL 1.0 considered as human readable? I noticed that last Friday. It's a bit weird that we didn't have this handy. I added it. https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-1.0/EPL-1.0.txt But the HTML version is fine. I declare this review successful. Please continue with your release. |