Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [1.8] Inline method inside a lambda method incorrectly places local variables before the lambda body | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Eugene Ryazanov <katzyn> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | JDT-UI-Inbox <jdt-ui-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | noopur_gupta |
| Version: | 4.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | stalebug | ||
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |
Inlining of min() method in the following sample produces incorrect code. public class T { static { a(t -> min(t - 1, 0)); } static void a(LongUnaryOperator a) { } static long min(long a, long b) { return a <= b ? a : b; } } Actual result: static { long a1 = t - 1; a(t -> (a1 <= (long) 0 ? a1 : 0)); } Expected result: static { a(t -> { long a1 = t - 1; return (a1 <= (long) 0 ? a1 : 0); }); }