| Summary: | Move JDT Project compliance to 1.8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Manoj N Palat <manoj.palat> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Manoj N Palat <manoj.palat> |
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert, gautier.desaintmartinlacaze, jarthana, Lars.Vogel, markus.kell.r, stephan.herrmann |
| Version: | 4.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 4.7 M2 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| See Also: |
https://git.eclipse.org/r/79906 https://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.core.git/commit/?id=c4142104341bedc713dc7fc2b7a6bb4a085a059e https://git.eclipse.org/r/80553 https://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.core.git/commit/?id=ceb7c344be818a3d9faaafcabd5c79df010e51f3 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 457413 | ||
|
Description
Manoj N Palat
(In reply to Manoj Palat from comment #0) > An early move to 1.8 would help to use the java 8 constructs during > implementation. Let us discuss on this bug if there are issues for moving to > 1.8. As mentioned in today's call, we must not make changes in the beta branch that aren't related to Java 9, i.e. changes between master and beta should be kept minimal. Removing target milestone BETA_JAVA9. This is for master branch, or for later. (In reply to Markus Keller from comment #2) > Removing target milestone BETA_JAVA9. This is for master branch, or for > later. To take this up for 4.7 M2/M3 New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/79906 Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/79906 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.core.git/commit/?id=c4142104341bedc713dc7fc2b7a6bb4a085a059e reopening for minor version addition. New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/80553 Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/80553 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.core.git/commit/?id=ceb7c344be818a3d9faaafcabd5c79df010e51f3 Verified for 4.7 M2 using I20160912-2000 build *** Bug 474584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |